On Latin and Slavic cognates

There are literary hundreds of Latin words in all European languages and we can easily trace their origins back to the times when Roman legions were making way for the civilization as we know it. But do not worry, this list will not contain this kind of words. We will focus only on the really ancient ones.

NOTE: This is by no means a definitive list, just a quick scan of the BASIC Latin dictionary. I avoided the words that are not obvious cognates but could possibly be related. Slavic words are based on the Serbian language, but most of the words are common for all Slavs.

A few basic terms

Nature

MARE – MORE (SEA)  IGNEUS – OGANJ (FIRE) ULIGO – VLAGA (HUMIDITY) NEBULA-NEBO (CLOUD-SKY)

Animals:

MUS – MISH (MOUSE) AGNIS – JAGNJE (LAMB), OVIS – OVCA (SHEEP) CABALLUS – KOBILA (HORSE)

Body parts:

OCULUS – OKO (EYE), POLLEX – PALAC (THUMB) CRUOR – KRV (BLOOD) OS – USTA (MOUTH)

Common verbs:

MOLO – MLETI (MILL, TO GRIND) STO – STOJATI (TO STAND), SEDEO – SEDETI (TO SIT), VIDEO – VIDETI (TO SEE), ITIO – ICHI (TO GO) SECCARE – SECHI (TO CUT), PROSECO – PRESECHI (TO CUT OFF)

Misc

LAEVUS – LEVI (LEFT) DOMUS – DOM (HOME) TU – TI (YOU), TIBI – TEBI (TO YOU) OLEUM – ULJE (OIL) PRAE – PRE (BEFORE), PROD – PRED (IN FRONT), PROVIDUS – PROVIDJENJE (PROVIDENCE) CASTUS – CHIST (PURE), CASTITAS – CHESTITOST (MORAL PURITY) VOLUNTAS – VOLJA (WILL)

POLIS (CITY) – POLJE (FIELD) GRANUM (GRAIN) – ZRNO

This is where it gets really interesting. In Latin “Polis” means “city”, but in Slavic “polje” means “field”. Constantinople, for example, is   “Konstantinopolj” in Slavic and these words are obvious cognates. However, the Roman goddess of pastures is “Pales“, which does not make any sense, unless related to the Slavic meaning of “field”.

SUUS, (but in gen, dat, voc and nom SVAE) – SVOJ (of oneself, belonging to oneself, his own, her own, his, her, its, their)

SUM – SAM (I AM), EST – JESTE (IT IS)

In both of these words, we see that Slavic form is more complex, as “sam” is just a short form of “jesam” (I am). It is therefore impossible that Slavs took this word from Latin.

VIVIR / VITA (TO LIVE / LIFE) – ZHIV / ZHIT

The sound “ZH” is typical for Slavic languages, although it survived in French and Portuguese as well. Latin did not have it, so it became “V”. It is possible that “ZH” becomes “V” but not vice-versa, meaning that the Slavic pronunciation is older.

LUX – LUCH (LIGHT), NOX – NOCH (NIGHT)

Now, we know that the letter “X” came to Latin via Greek “Chi“, where it was (apparently) pronounced as “Kh”. This means that if we read Latin with the original Greek pronunciation we get very close to Slavic words. (!) In Balkans, unlike in Russia and Ukraine, it is actually two sounds of different softness (Ч + Ћ). Also, it seems that this was not only a pre-Roman sound. It can still exist today in Italian and Spanish (ie. Buena noches in Spanish)

And while the etymology of the word “lux” in Latin is unknown, the Slavic one is related to the wood of the pine tree that is drenched in resin. When the wood is cut it excretes resin in order to heal itself. This type of wood is perfect for starting the fire, as it is easy to light and it burns for a very long time. The word for the resine is “luch”, and comes from “luchiti” which in Slavic means “to drench, secrete”. Obviously, this is the reason that the light is called “luch” in Slavic. Here is the Wikipedia article about luch (only in Serbian unfortunately).

Note that this type of parallel does not exist in Latin. The word resin has the same root as English – resina. But there is another Latin word – lac. The official etymology is on an image below.

Caminus – Kamen

The Latin word Caminus, comes from the ancient Greek “kámīnos“. According to Wiktionary, the suffix “-ῑνος” is pre-Greek and the etymology is unknown. The only suggested connection is with Slavic kamen – stone, as the ancient hearths were made of stone.

Save

Liked it? Take a second to support Cogniarchae on Patreon!

8 COMMENTS

  1. Latin lux and nox are actually luc-s and noc-s (where the c is pronounced like a k). The -s is the nominative singular ending, not part of the word. The graphic similarity between x and chi is unrelated.

    • Yes, that is an official view that I am challenging here. Spanish and Sicilian Italian “noCHe” sound is the same like in Slavic languages. Also it is not true that x and chi is unrelated, Romans took this letter from the Greeks, that is officially accepted. But apparently the Greek sound was Kh and not Ch.

  2. SUM – SAM (I AM), EST – JESTE (IT IS)
    Actually, it is from Latin, for some unkown reason. There is a strong pattern. Here are Serbian – Latin pairs:

    (I) am – jesam/sam – sum
    (you) are – jesi/si – es
    (he) is – jeste/je – est
    (we) are – jesmo/smo – sumus
    (you) are (pl.) – jeste/ste – estis
    (they) are – jesu/su – sunt

    Serbian has long and short form – ja jesam and ja sam both mean “I am”.

  3. Resin in polish is close related to: rzeźba, rzeza, rysa. Russian: rezat’ means rezać, rzezać in polish. Some forms are like: rezany, rzezany, wyrzezany. All mean „cut in graves-like pattern”

  4. Most of there words are not isoglosses: why not German meer? Sanskrit Agni? Greek νεφέλη (nephele)? English mouse or Albanian mi or Greek μυς (mys)? And Greek αμνός, Albanian enjë, Welsh Oen? Why you forget οις (owis) and English ewe? Oculus and German Auge? Cruor and English raw and Greek κρέας (krewas)? Os and Hittite ais and Sanskrit ās? I can continue but I hope it’s enough. This article is misleading.
    There are also some errors vivir is not latin, in latin you have vivere and it’s clearly untrue that ž became v because latin didn’t have that sound, v is the regular latin change from PIE *gwiHw->wīw->vīv-. The alternative*gwiHw—>žīv—>vīv doesn’t make sense. The Slavic pronunciation is not older it’s just different because it’s a satem language and doesn’t preserve labiovelars *gwiHw—>gīw—>živ- via Slavic palatalization.
    Of course Slavs didn’t take the forms of the verb “to be” from Latin, they are almost identical in most indoeuropean languages!

  5. Because , proto serbian language is older then Latin and much more older then all wetern europian languages who derivate from latin. The first industrial revolution was in Vinca in Serbia before 8 000 years and from that point, indoeuropian languages spread all around eurasia, west and east. All graphemas that are used later in greek latin and serbian language were founed in Vinca in Serbia. Sanskrt derivate from proto serbian language. If you dont believe to me, check out one of the world greatest Lingusts , Mario ALINEI Who claim the same thing as me, that proto serbian is mother language for all indoeuropian languages ,not sanskrt. He is not the only one. Read Mario Alinei Theory Of Paleolit Continuity. You made a mess with your facts. Please read the guy I suggest you. Have a nise day.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.